As everyone who knows me is well aware, I usually neither comment on, nor do I promote books.. either by word of mouth or in this space. I prefer to keep to commentaries on the subject of the process of writing and on issues related to publishing.

What follows is NOT an exception to that rule!

What this column is about is learning the process of writing, editing and some of many arcane and obscure issues related to getting published.

An author I highly respect, Lynn Flewelling, is offering a course on writing… and to make it even more fun, the course will will be taking place on a cruise ship.

The inclusive dates are 23-30 May of 2010, so make your reservations early.

See the details at Lynn Flewelling’s home page

and don’t forget your shades, the sunscreen, your bathing suits and the Dramamine.

You can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time. (P.T. Barnum)

Or can you?

It seems to me that the media, both broadcast and Internet, got suckered big time over the Balloon Boy stunt this past week. Meanwhile the important issues of the day were buried in the noise.

And now that it’s been proven that it was all a hoax, what is the press saying about it… that they got suckered, that it’s the fault of those who perpetrated the sham, and that it’s not their fault.

Really?

Sold a lot of newspapers, didn’t they? Many of the Internet News (and I use the term loosely) sites and televised Journalism (?) programmes were full of reports that in the end meant nothing but that people willingly closed their eyes to the truth and got suckered.

What happened to responsible journalism?

It seems to me that much of what the todays press reports resembles what in the past was referred to as Yellow Journalism… Sensationalistic stories filled with prurient innuendo and little, if any, truth.

Are we so desperate as a society that outrageous stunts and scandalous behaviour are more important than the events that affect and shape our lives and the world around us?

Have we, as a society, been conditioned to truly be that gullible?

I fear the answer is yes.

clowns_short.jpg

writing_graphic_201_x_132.jpgOn Dec. 31, 1975, former Lake Superior State University Public Relations Director Bill Rabe and his colleagues cooked up an idea to banish overused words and phrases. Rabe distributed the list on New Year’s Day. In the following weeks, when nominations for the next year’s list came pouring into his office, Rabe said he knew the list would endure. He was correct.

The LSSU PR office still receives thousands of nominations every year from people who never seem to tire of talking about words and language.

And so, without further ado, the 2009 banished word list from LSSU.

This December, if all goes well at the Large Hadron Collider, they will be testing one of the most bizarre theories in science.

Nothing as revolutionary as extra dimensions of space-time or dark matter or even black holes that will eat the Earth.

What they will be testing is the notion that the collider is being sabotaged by its own future.

A pair of physicists have suggested that the hypothesized Higgs boson, which physicists hope to produce with the collider, might be so abhorrent to nature itself that, like a time traveler who goes back in time to kill his grandfather, its creation would ripple backward through time and stop the collider before it could make one.

B-THEUN_solo

I recently realised that I spend at least a quarter of each waking day reading; journals, magazines and newspapers… most of which have gone digital. Then there are e-mail messages, blogs, messages on a dozen or so on-line forums, manuscripts and other documents.

So much content, so little time.

I have a library, which is fairly large, not too dusty or musty, which is full of books and documents that date from ages past to the present, all of which have been carefully indexed and organised so I can find what I want.

Of course, many of them now also reside in a digital version of that same ‘library’… which is a several terabytes worth of manuscripts, e-Books, PDF formatted documents, soundtracks and albums full of digital images, audio files, video files and a ‘digital jukebox’ loaded with copies of my CD’s and DVD’s.

All of this content resides on several different systems, all of which are carefully and religiously backed up across several redundant raid arrays and archived on several different back-up media.

… And nearly all of which I can access nearly instantly from almost anywhere on or near this large sphere we call Earth as long as I have a cellular telephone, PDA, computer or
some other form of digital reader.

In a recent article on eBooks in the Guardian Robert McCrum led his column with this interesting bit…

“The experience of reading a sustained piece of prose is not going to be fundamentally altered by a new delivery system.”

He’s right. Whether it is in printed with ink on paper, or digitally on electronic paper, or formatted for a book reader, or even done in audio format, the experience of reading will not be fundamentally altered… because it requires the human mind, with it’s ability to imagine, to make the experience of those words come alive.

Will alternate multimedia forms of books change the experience?

Not appreciably, or at least I hope not.

evil.jpg

“Private opinion creates public opinion. That is why private opinion, and private behavior, and private conversation are so terrifyingly important.” – Jan Struther, English poet (1901-1953).

There is a lot of noise and debate about the proposed Google Book Settlement. On one side we have Google, with the Author’s Guild and American Association of Publishers.

On the other we have the Open Book Alliance, the Open Content Alliance, and everyone else… writers, agents, independent book store owners, and on and on goes the list.

To understand the disagreement, you have to understand that the Authors Guild and the American Association of Publishers represent only a small cross section of the industry, and a small percentage of it at that. Neither represent authors or industry members in other countries.

… and no other country is considering amending their copyright laws.

Only in the USA is Google attempting to force a change favourable to themselves in this regard.

Part of my problem with it lies in the fact that the agreement is deeply convoluted (read the 350 pages for yourself), and in the long term benefits only Google.

The other part of my problem with it is the fact that they tried to accomplish this by using the federal court system, which is an intentional attempt to bypass the Congress of the United States; the only governing body that has the right to change or amend the laws of the country.

Believe and choose as you will, but my vote is NO to Google.

I encourage the courts and congress to say NO as well.

eye_tear.jpgThis article, re-published intact, comes from the July 12, 2009 issue of The Guardian (guardian.co.uk) Newspaper.

The author is Jimmy Carter, former president of the United States of America.

The words of God do not justify cruelty to women.
Discrimination and abuse wrongly backed by doctrine are damaging society, argues the former US president

“Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status …” (Article 2, Universal Declaration of Human Rights)

“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28)

“I have been a practising Christian all my life and a deacon and Bible teacher for many years. My faith is a source of strength and comfort to me, as religious beliefs are to hundreds of millions of people around the world.

“So my decision to sever my ties with the Southern Baptist Convention, after six decades, was painful and difficult. It was, however, an unavoidable decision when th e convention’s leaders, quoting a few carefully selected Bible verses and claiming that Eve was created second to Adam and was responsible for original sin, ordained that women must be “subservient” to their husbands and prohibited from serving as deacons, pastors or chaplains in the military service. This was in conflict with my belief – confirmed in the holy scriptures – that we are all equal in the eyes of God.

“This view that women are somehow inferior to men is not restricted to one religion or belief. It is widespread. Women are prevented from playing a full and equal role in many faiths.

“Nor, tragically, does its influence stop at the walls of the church, mosque, synagogue or temple. This discrimination, unjustifiably attributed to a Higher Authority, has provided a reason or excuse for the deprivation of women’s equal rights across the world for centuries. The male interpretations of religious texts and the way they interact with, and reinforce, traditional practices justify some of the most pervasive, persistent, flagrant and damaging examples of human rights abuses.

“At their most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to the wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs many millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives, and continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and influence within their own communities.

“The impact of these religious beliefs touches every aspect of our lives. They help explain why in many countries boys are educated before girls; why girls are told when and whom they must marry; and why many face enormous and unacceptable risks in pregnancy and childbirth because their basic health needs are not met.

“In some Islamic nations, women are restricted in their movements, punished for permitting the exposure of an arm or ankle, deprived of education, prohibited from driving a car or competing with men for a job. If a woman is raped, she is often most severely punished as the guilty party in the crime.

“The same discriminatory thinking lies behind the continuing gender gap in pay and why there are still so few women in office in Britain and the United States. The root of this prejudice lies deep in our histories, but its impact is felt every day. It is not women and girls alone who suffer. It damages all of us. The evidence shows that investing in women and girls delivers major benefits for everyone in society. An educated woman has healthier children. She is more likely to send them to school. She earns more and invests what she earns in her family.

“It is simply self-defeating for any community to discriminate against half its population. We need to challenge these self-serving and out-dated attitudes and practices – as we are seeing in Iran where women are at the forefront of the battle for democracy and freedom.

“I understand, however, why many political leaders can be reluctant about stepping into this minefield. Religion, and tradition, are powerful and sensitive area to challenge.

“But my fellow Elders and I, who come from many faiths and backgrounds, no longer need to worry about winning votes or avoiding controversy – and we are deeply committed to challenging injustice wherever we see it.

“The Elders have decided to draw particular attention to the responsibility of religious and traditional leaders in ensuring equality and human rights. We have recently published a statement that declares: ‘The justification of discrimination against women and girls on grounds of religion or tradition, as if it were prescribed by a Higher Authority, is unacceptable.’

“We are calling on all leaders to challenge and change the harmful teachings and practices, no matter how ingrained, which justify discrimination against women. We ask, in particular, that leaders of all religions have the courage to acknowledge and emphasise the positive messages of dignity and equality that all the world’s major faiths share.

“Although not having training in religion or theology, I understand that the carefully selected verses found in the holy scriptures to justify the superiority of men owe more to time and place – and the determination of male leaders to hold onto their influence – than eternal truths. Similar Biblical excerpts could be found to support the approval of slavery and the timid acquiescence to oppressive rulers.

“At the same time, I am also familiar with vivid descriptions in the same scriptures in which women are revered as pre-eminent leaders. During the years of the early Christian church women served as deacons, priests, bishops, apostles, teachers and prophets. It wasn’t until the fourth century that dominant Christian leaders, all men, twisted and distorted holy scriptures to perpetuate their ascendant positions within the religious hierarchy.

“I know, too, that Billy Graham, one of the most widely respected and revered Christians during my lifetime, did not understand why women were prevented from being priests and preachers. He said: ‘Women preach all over the world. It doesn’t bother me from my study of the scriptures.’

“The truth is that male religious leaders have had – and still have – an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter.

“Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions – all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views.”

• Jimmy Carter was US president from 1977-81. The Elders are an independent group of eminent global leaders, brought together by Nelson Mandela, who offer their influence and experience to support peace building, help address major causes of human suffering and promote the shared interests of humanity.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2009

While the questions surrounding Digital Rights are many…

What Amazon did, by removing Kindle books that were sold fraudulently by a third party… who by the way… had no right to sell them in the first place, and refunding/crediting the purchasers accounts, was the right thing to do.

… but e-Publishers like Amazon and others who allow customers to publish content unsupervised and unchecked are asking for this kind of problem and more.

We’ve already seen instances of books that are in the Public Domain copied from sources such as Project Gutenberg and offered for sale under names other than the original authors.

Copies of e-books that are still in print have been found, likewise hijacked. The authors name and cover graphics were changed and the book fraudulently offered for sale on another ’self-publishing’ site. Thankfully they were not smart enough to change the ISBN numbers nor the authors introduction and a few other important identifiers.

In both cases the content was removed from the sites and the ‘author’ prosecuted, but sadly this kind of fraud-in-the-name-of-greed will no doubt continue until some sort of submission review process is instituted to prevent unauthorised sales such as what occurred with the two George Orwell books.

I had a good laugh at what Lauren Weinstein, a privacy advocate, had to say on the subject.

“This is precisely the functional equivalent of Barnes & Noble — or Amazon itself for that matter — using a crowbar or lock pick to break into your home or business, then stealing back a previous physical book purchase, replacing it with the equivalent value in cash.”

No… this is not the same thing at all. Electronic Digital Rights licensing is complicated.

So.. if you’re too lazy or can’t be bothered to actually read the licenses and the disclaimers that come with devices like the Kindle, or the terms and conditions of purchase you’ve agreed to when you purchase digital content… maybe you shouldn’t buy them in the first place.

… and just for the record? There’s nothing really new in any of this. Ask anyone who has tried to register or get customer support for pirated copies of licensed software and found it ‘removed’ from or ‘disabled’ on their computers.

Software authors don’t sell their ’source rights’ to customers who buy a copy any more than book authors give away their copyright rights when someone buys a copy of a book… be it on paper or in electronic format.

I’m not one who often considers reviewing books, however, a book was recently published that purports to be a journalistic examination of ‘Facebook,’ an iconic social networking business enterprise.

The Accidental Billionaires — The Founding of Facebook: A Tale of Sex, Money, Genius and Betrayal by Ben Mezrich hit the bookstores recently.

The editors at Businessweek have already called it “a tawdry mishmash.”

I agree with them, but my question is… Is this really journalism?

The author admits that he re-created dialog and scenes for the book, and that he was unable to talk to Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s founder and CEO.

His preface, warning that “liberties are about to be taken” elicits a Bloomberg reviewer to remark, that the author is “simply making stuff up.”

As a writer of fiction, I can tell you that ‘making things up’ is why it’s called ‘fiction’.

In journalism, ‘making things up’ is called ‘lying through your teeth‘.

“Ben Mezrich clearly aspires to be the Jackie Collins or Danielle Steele of Silicon Valley,” Facebook spokesman Elliot Schrage told a reporter for Reuters.

Mezrich says he relies on commonly accepted reporting techniques — interviews, documents, piecing a story together — and that his style upsets some journalists.

That most of his previous books have suffered both lack of factual integrity and similar criticism by both fellow journalists and even his own subjects has not deterred him.

Mezrich told Time Magazine that, “My style is this sort of immersion journalism, where I go inside the story and built it as a thriller, as a narrative.”

In the world of writers and authors, that’s called historical fiction.

Mezrich says, “There are a lot of journalists who don’t get what I do. They don’t understand my style or they’re frustrated by it. And sometimes they’re quite angry about it, which is funny. I re-create the story. It’s a true story. It’s non-fiction.”

When you’re making up conversations and creating what you think happened or might have happened, it’s hardly non-fiction, and it’s definitely not journalism.

Not surprisingly, the book is doing well on the retail sales chart.

What is equally not surprising is that the book has already been optioned for a movie, where even more ‘liberties’ will be taken by screenwriters and movie executives.

That the same actors who have appeared in previous film incarnations of Mezrichs’ other books are already out praising the book as if it were a gift from god makes me stand back and wonder if this isn’t just a set-up for another tawdry made-for-television-movie-of-the-week expose.

In the end, this book is a work of fiction.

If there is any truth in it beyond the name of the company and it’s co-founders, it is that the controversy over this book is going to generate a lot of traffic on the internet, and a lot of money for the author, the lawyers, and probably the owners of Facebook.

After being interviewed by the school administration, a prospective teacher had this to say.

“Let me see if I’ve got this right.

“You want me to go into that room with all those kids, correct their disruptive behavior, observe them for signs of abuse, monitor their dress habits, censor their T-shirt messages, and instill in them a love for learning.

“You want me to check their backpacks for weapons, wage war on drugs and sexually transmitted diseases, and raise their sense of self esteem and personal pride.

“You want me to teach them patriotism and good citizenship, sportsmanship and fair play, and how to register to vote, balance a checkbook, and apply for a job.

“You want me to check their heads for lice, recognize signs of antisocial behavior, and make sure that they all pass the final exams.

“You also want me to provide them with an equal education regardless of their handicaps, and communicate regularly with their parents in English, Spanish or any other language, by letter, telephone, newsletter, and report card.

“You want me to do all this with a piece of chalk, a blackboard, a bulletin board, a few books, a big smile, and a starting salary that qualifies me for food stamps.

“You want me to do all this, and then you tell me…

“I CAN’T PRAY?”

The Outer Alliance is a group of SF/F writers who have come together as allies for the advocacy of LGBT issues in literature. Made up of individuals of all walks of life, our goal is to educate, support, and celebrate LGBT contributions in the science-fiction and fantasy genres.

 

November 2009
S M T W T F S
« Oct    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Flickr Photos

Bix Beiderbecke Volume 1  Columbia Masterpieces

Sea Glass  - Maria V. Snyder

THe House Of Cards

Choices - Terence Blanchard

Tinker Tailer Soldier Spy - John LeCarre

House of Many Ways - Diana Wynne Jones

More Photos

Book, Album & Movie of the week

wiccamoon2side.jpg